Skip to content
Business Litigation

Ashtel’s $9.4 Million Fraud Verdict: When Can an LLC Member Be Personally Liable?

By Omeed Mahrouyan · Published October 16, 2026 · Last reviewed October 16, 2026
Conceptual shipping containers and purchase-order documents illustrating commercial fraud and personal liability.
Conceptual illustration; does not depict actual cargo, locations, or case records.

A reported $9.4 million Ashtel fraud verdict illustrates the distinction between commercial nonpayment and personal liability for misrepresentation.

A commercial transaction becomes a fraud dispute

According to published reporting and plaintiff’s counsel, a Los Angeles County jury awarded Ashtel Studios, Inc. $9,397,000 in economic damages on October 9, 2026, after finding Oak Sourcing & Logistics, LLC and its managing member, Matthew John Sandvig, liable for fraud. 1 2

The dispute involved pandemic-era purchases of medical examination gloves. Ashtel’s counsel reports that representations about customer contracts and financing induced Ashtel to supply merchandise, including a shipment that Oak Sourcing did not pay for or collect. 2

The case illustrates an important distinction: a company’s failure to pay and an individual’s fraudulent representations involve different legal questions.

Nonpayment alone does not establish fraud

Under California’s intentional-misrepresentation framework, a plaintiff must establish a false factual representation, knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, intent to induce reliance, reasonable reliance, harm, and that the reliance substantially caused the harm. 3

An unpaid invoice alone does not establish those elements. Relevant evidence may include communications about existing financing or customer commitments, what the speaker knew, and whether the supplier relied on those statements when committing inventory or funds.

Limited liability does not necessarily protect personal misconduct

California Corporations Code section 17703.04 generally separates an LLC’s obligations from those of its members and managers. A person does not become responsible for company debts solely because of that role. However, subdivision (c) preserves a member’s potential liability for personally participating in tortious conduct. 4

That is different from alter-ego liability, which concerns circumstances permitting liability despite the entity’s separate existence. The statute addresses alter ego separately in subdivision (b). 4

These California provisions are general background, not a statement of the law applied at this trial. Reporting identifies Oak Sourcing as a Wyoming company, and California’s statute directs certain questions about members’ and managers’ liability for a foreign LLC’s obligations to the law of its formation jurisdiction. 1 5

The reported verdict is not the end of every issue

FreightWaves reported on October 16 that Ashtel intended to submit a proposed judgment and that separate alter-ego proceedings involving Oak Insurance Group remained ahead. The article also reported an open-book-account finding whose amount should not simply be added to the fraud award without resolving overlapping damages. 6

The materials reviewed do not establish a final collectible total or that Oak Insurance Group has been held liable.

Practical steps for businesses

Before committing substantial inventory or financing, verify material claims about purchasing authority, financing, and customer commitments. Preserve the representations, purchase orders, payment records, and evidence of resulting losses.

If a transaction fails, evaluate the company’s contractual obligations and each individual’s conduct separately.

Learn more about Mahrouyan Law’s business litigation practice, or read the unpaid-invoice guide.

Footnotes

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.

Mahrouyan Law handles these matters directly. Read more about how the firm approaches small business & commercial litigation in California, or discuss your own situation with the firm.

Omeed Mahrouyan, founder of Mahrouyan Law, P.C.
Omeed Mahrouyan
Founder & Principal Attorney
Mahrouyan Law, P.C.
California Bar No. 352171 · State Bar profile

Omeed Mahrouyan is the founder of Mahrouyan Law, P.C., a California firm handling business and commercial litigation, property and cargo damage claims, personal injury, landlord representation, startup transactions, and practical intellectual property matters. Clients work directly with him on strategy, drafting, and case decisions.

More about Omeed Mahrouyan →