An injured person's death does not necessarily end the claim, but it can change the recoverable damages. The claim type, filing history, and statutory exceptions matter.
An injured person's death does not necessarily end their claim. But death can change which damages remain recoverable, who may pursue the case, and how quickly it needs to move. The applicable claim, the filing history, and statutory exceptions all matter.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle's October 20, 2026 reporting, Libby Thaler, an 89-year-old plaintiff, alleges she was injured during paratransit transportation, and her attorney has asked the court for an expedited trial. Liability remains unresolved, and the reporting does not indicate that preference has been granted.5
- Continues the decedent's own claim through a representative or successor
- Survival action
- Pain, suffering, and disfigurement are generally excluded
- Damages
- The § 377.34(b) filing window closed December 31, 2025
- Exception window
- Age over 70 alone is not enough under § 36(a)
- Trial preference
The Claim Can Survive the Plaintiff
California law allows a surviving claim to continue through the decedent's legally authorized representative or successor in interest.1 The case does not simply disappear because the injured person has died. The claim remains the decedent's own claim; the representative steps in to pursue it on behalf of the estate or successors.
The damages, however, generally narrow. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.34(a), recoverable damages in a survival action generally concern losses the decedent incurred before death. Qualifying economic losses—such as medical expenses or lost earnings accrued before death—and otherwise available penalties or punitive damages may remain recoverable. Damages for the decedent's pain, suffering, or disfigurement are generally excluded.2
A Closed Filing Window With a Preserved Exception
Section 377.34(b) preserves an exception for actions filed between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2025, and for actions granted trial preference under section 36 before January 1, 2022. In those qualifying cases, the broader damages rules of the exception may still apply.2
That filing window has closed. A case filed today cannot use it, and a preference order granted today does not itself satisfy the pre-2022 preference exception. But qualifying earlier cases did not automatically lose the exception in 2026, and neither the injury nor the death had to occur within the window.2
Section 377.34(f) separately preserves the elder- and dependent-adult-abuse framework. Age alone does not establish such a claim. Whether an amended complaint or an existing action becomes a survival action depends on the filing history and requires separate analysis.2
Trial Preference Is a Separate Question
Under section 36(a), a party over 70 may request trial preference. The court must grant the request upon finding both that the party has a substantial interest in the action and that the party's health creates a need to prevent prejudice to that interest. Age alone is not enough, and the six-month survival standard in section 36(d) does not apply to a section 36(a) request.3
When preference is granted under section 36(a), section 36(f) generally requires the trial to be set within 120 days after the motion is granted, subject to statutory continuance provisions. That is a scheduling rule, not a guarantee that the case will be resolved within 120 days. Preference changes the calendar; it does not change what must be proven.3
Wrongful Death Is a Different Claim
A survival claim concerns the decedent's own losses. A wrongful-death claim is different: it concerns qualifying survivors' legally compensable losses—such as the loss of financial support, companionship, and household contributions—when another's wrongful act or neglect causes the death.4
Death during an injury lawsuit does not automatically establish a wrongful-death claim. Causation and statutory standing remain necessary, and wrongful death does not simply restore the damages excluded from a survival action.4
Practical Takeaway
When an injured plaintiff's health or age raises timing concerns, review the filing history, potential statutory exceptions, and eligibility for trial preference promptly. These questions are time-sensitive and depend on the procedural record.
To discuss a California personal-injury matter, contact Mahrouyan Law, P.C. This article provides general information and is not legal advice. The applicable rules and available remedies depend on the facts and procedural history.
Footnotes
- 1.
California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.30 — authority to bring the surviving claim
Supports: Justia reproduction of the code, not an official legislative website.
↩ Return to text - 2.
Supports: Justia reproduction of the code, not an official legislative website.
↩ Return to text - 3.
California Code of Civil Procedure § 36, subdivisions (a), (d), and (f) — trial preference
Supports: Justia reproduction of the code, not an official legislative website.
↩ Return to text - 4.
California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 377.60–377.61 — wrongful-death standing and damages · Section 377.61
Supports: Justia reproduction of the code, not an official legislative website.
↩ Return to text - 5.
Supports: Secondary reporting about a pending lawsuit; the complaint and docket have not been independently reviewed.
↩ Return to text
Mahrouyan Law handles these matters directly. Read more about how the firm approaches personal injury in California, or discuss your own situation with the firm.

Omeed Mahrouyan is the founder of Mahrouyan Law, P.C., a California firm handling business and commercial litigation, property and cargo damage claims, personal injury, landlord representation, startup transactions, and practical intellectual property matters. Clients work directly with him on strategy, drafting, and case decisions.
More about Omeed Mahrouyan →
